Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 614.844
The article presents a scientific justification for a generalized criterion for choosing an unmanned helicopter-type aircraft for equipping units of EMERCOM of Russia in order to improve the efficiency of operational tasks in emergency situations. The authors have developed a comprehensive methodological approach that integrates an expert assessment method involving five specialists directly involved in the maintenance and use of helicopter-type unmanned aircraft, a dimensional analysis method for the formation of dimensionless complex indicators, as well as a fuzzy logic apparatus based on the Mamdani fuzzy inference system in the MatLab mathematical modeling software environment. As part of the study, a survey of experts was conducted to determine the significance of the technical parameters of helicopter-type unmanned aircraft, the Kendall concordance coefficient was calculated, confirming a high degree of consistency of experts' opinions, the weighting coefficients of the parameters and weighted average estimates of six samples of helicopter-type unmanned aircraft were determined. A generalized efficiency indicator has been formed based on the integration of the technical efficiency indicator and a weighted average estimate. The results of the study made it possible to classify the considered samples of helicopter-type unmanned aircraft by efficiency levels and can be used in the selection of promising samples for equipping units of the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations.
helicopter-type unmanned aircraft, generalized selection criteria, generalized efficiency indicator, method of expert assessment and dimensional analysis
1. An Unmanned Aircraft System for Automatic Forest Fire Monitoring and Measurement / L. Merino [et al.] // Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 2012. Vol. 65. P. 533–548. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9560-x
2. Erdelj M., Król M., Natalizio E. Wireless Sensor Networks and Multi-UAV systems for natural disaster management // Computer Networks. 2017. Vol. 124. P. 72–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2017.05.021
3. Yuan C., Zhang Y., Liu Z. A survey on technologies for automatic forest fire monitoring, detection, and fighting using unmanned aerial vehicles and remote sensing techniques // Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2015. Vol. 45. № 7. P. 783–792. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0347
4. Homainejad N., Rizos C. Application of multiple categories of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in different airspaces for bushfire monitoring and response // Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. P: 55–60. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-55-2015
5. Restás Á. Drone Applications for Supporting Disaster Management // World Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2015. Vol. 3. P. 316–321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2015.33C047
6. Colomina I., Molina P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review // ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2014. Vol. 92. P. 79–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013
7. Sytdykov M.R., Ivanov A.V., Abdullaeva Yu.S. O voprosah avarijnosti ob"ektov neftegazovoj promyshlennosti // Aktual'nye problemy pozharnoj bezopasnosti: materialy XXXVI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Moskva, 2024. S. 119–123. EDN NCEJHN.
8. Sytdykov M.R., Shupnev D.S., Abdullaeva Yu.S. Analiz avarijnosti ob"ektov neftegazodobyvayushchej promyshlennosti // Sovremennye problemy obespecheniya bezopasnosti: sb. materialov XXVI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Ekaterinburg, 2024. S. 102–107. EDN TTJMOJ.
9. Sytdykov M.R., Ivanov A.V., Abdullaeva Yu.S. O problematike tusheniya pozharov na morskih stacionarnyh platformah v Arkticheskoj zone Rossijskoj Federacii // Pozharnaya bezopasnost': sovremennye vyzovy. Problemy i puti resheniya: materialy vseross. nauch.-prakt. konf., Sankt-Peterburg, 2025. S. 8–10. EDN IUYYAA.
10. Brushlinskij N.N., Sokolov S.V., Vagner P. Chelovechestvo i pozhary. M.: Triada LTD, 2007. 141 s.
11. Matveev A.V., Matiev R.T. Prinyatie reshenij pri pozharah v gornoj mestnosti: Sravnitel'nyj analiz metodov monitoringa // Nacional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie. 2023. № 2 (42). S. 76–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37468/2307-1400-2023-2-76-90
12. Sytdykov M.R., Beskov M.S., Cygankov V.P. Opredelenie optimal'nogo vida bespilotnogo vozdushnogo sudna vertoletnogo tipa dlya osnashcheniya podrazdelenij MCHS Rossii // Primenenie aviacionno-spasatel'nyh tekhnologij dlya preduprezhdeniya i likvidacii chrezvychajnyh situacij: sb. trudov sekcii HHXIV Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Himki, 2024. S. 111–116. EDN QVTRMU.
13. Bakanov M.O., Ankudinov M.V. Primenenie bespilotnyh letatel'nyh apparatov pri provedenii razvedki lesnyh pozharov // Novaya nauka: Ot idei k rezul'tatu. 2016. № 10-3. S. 12–15. EDN WWRPHL.
14. Guhman A.A. Vvedenie v teoriyu podobiya. 2-e izd. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1973. 296 s.
15. Sedov L.I. Metody podobiya i razmernosti v mekhanike. 10-e izd. M.: Nauka, 1987. 432 s.
16. Sytdykov M.R., Ivanov A.V. Nauchnoe obosnovanie obobshchennogo kriteriya vybora sredstv pozharotusheniya // Problemy upravleniya riskami v tekhnosfere. 2024. № 4 (72). S. 130–143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61260/1998-8990-2025-2024-4-130-143
17. Podinovskij V.V., Nogin V.D. Pareto-optimal'nye resheniya mnogokriterial'nyh zadach. M.: Fizmatlit, 2017. 256 s.
18. Matiev R.T. Metodika prinyatiya upravlencheskih reshenij po vyboru sposoba monitoringa prirodnyh pozharov v gornoj mestnosti // Nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Gosudarstvennoj protivopozharnoj sluzhby MCHS Rossii». 2023. № 4. S. 169–184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61260/2218-130X-2024-2023-4-169-184
19. Dalamagkidis K., Valavanis K.P., Piegl L.A. On integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system: issues, challenges, operational restrictions, certification, and recommendations. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011. 218 p.
20. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets // Information and Control. 1965. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 338–353. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
21. Utkin O V., Matveev A.V., Nefed'ev S.A. Sravnitel'nyj analiz metodov mnogokriterial'noj ocenki pri otbore kadrov v organizacionnyh sistemah // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2025. № 9. S. 107–123. EDN SWUSOM.
22. Borisov V.V., Kruglov V.V., Fedulov A.S. Nechetkie modeli i seti. 2-e izd., stereotip. M.: Goryachaya liniya-Telekom, 2012. 284 s.
23. Zajchenko Yu.P. Nechetkie modeli i metody v intellektual'nyh sistemah. Kiev: izdatel'skij dom «Slovo», 2008. 344 s.
24. Mamdani E.H., Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller // International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 1975. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 1–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
25. Ross T.J. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. 3rd ed. Wiley, 2010. 585 p.
26. Şahin B., Yilmaz M. A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Selection of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle // Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies. 2020. Vol. 13. № 1. P. 7–16.
27. Kumar A., Sharma R. Multi-criteria decision making for UAV selection using fuzzy logic approach // International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. 2019. Vol. 8. № 9. P. 2278–3075.
28. Ruposov V.L. Metody opredeleniya kolichestva ekspertov // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2015. № 3 (98). S. 286–292.
29. Romashkina G.F., Tatarova G.G. Koefficient konkordacii v analize sociologicheskih dannyh // Sociologiya: Metodologiya, metody, matematicheskie modeli. 2005. № 20. S. 131–158.
30. Orlov A.I. Organizacionno-ekonomicheskoe modelirovanie. M.: Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj tekhnicheskij universitet imeni N.E. Baumana, 2011. 486 s.
