Journals
Books
Monographies Textbooks
Submit manuscript
Home / Journals / Problems of risk management in the technosphere / Volume 2016 Issue 1 / INFLUENCE OF LEVEL OF TECHNOLOGICALNESS ON STABILITY OF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
INFLUENCE OF LEVEL OF TECHNOLOGICALNESS ON STABILITY OF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text
To cite
Citations:

INFLUENCE OF LEVEL OF TECHNOLOGICALNESS ON STABILITY OF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
Terechin S N 1
Kondrashin A V 2
Vlasova T V 3
Authors:
1.  Saint-Petersburg university of State fire service of EMERCOM of Russia

2.  Saint-Petersburg university of State fire service of EMERCOM of Russia

3.  Saint-Petersburg university of State fire service of EMERCOM of Russia

Type:
Article
Pages:
from 93 to 100
Status:
Published
Received:
12.03.2016
Accepted:
20.03.2016
Published:
25.03.2016
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
production systems, technologicalness, technologies, technological independence, stability of the production system
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The structure of stability, intercommunication of elements of the production system, is certain. The indexes of technological independence, influence on stability of the production system of level of technologicalness and applied technologies, are considered.

Keywords:
production systems, technologicalness, technologies, technological independence, stability of the production system
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Rudenskiy O.V., Rybak O.P. Innovacionnaya civilizaciya XXI veka: konvergenciya i sinergiya NBIC-tehnologiy. Tendencii i prognozy 2015-2030: inform.-analit. byulleten'. M., 2010. № 3. S. 11.

2. Kuznecov L.V. Sovremennye podhody v inzhiniringe slozhnyh tehnicheskih sistem / Konferenciya CSR «S-Z» dlya GK «Rosatom». SPb., 2013.

3. Kolobov A.A., Omel'chenko I.N., Orlov A.I. Menedzhment vysokih tehnologiy. Integrirovannye proizvodstvenno-korporativnye struktury M.: Izd-vo «Ekzamen», 2008. S. 566.

4. Novye proizvodstvennye tehnologii: publ. analit. doklad. M.: Skolkovskiy institut nauki i tehnologiy, 2014. S. 19.

5. Ansoff I. Strategicheskoe upravlenie: sokr. per. s angl. M.: Ekonomika, 1989. 519 s.

6. Yakubovskiy Yu.V. Teoriya i praktika sovershenstvovaniya korporativnogo upravleniya (na primere OAO «Dal'energo») // Problemy reformirovaniya i osobennosti razvitiya elektroenergetiki Dal'nego Vostoka: materialy nauch.-prakt. konf. Vladivostok: Izd-vo DVGTU, 2006. S. 190-193.

7. Karastelev B.Ya., Yakubovskiy Yu.V., Brovko P.M. Metodicheskie aspekty issledovaniya urovnya tehnologichnosti proizvodstvennyh sistem. Tehnologii i ekonomika Izvestiya DVFU // Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2014. № 3. S. 110.

8. Brovko P.M., Yakubovskiy Yu.V., Karastelev B.Ya. Vliyanie urovnya tehnologichnosti na ekonomicheskuyu ustoychivost' proizvodstvennoy sistemy // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2013. № 4. S. 468.

9. Fedorova L.A. Metodologicheskie principy formirovaniya modeli ocenki ustoychivosti // Voprosy upravleniya. URL: http://vestnik.uapa.ru/en/issue/2013/01/23/ (data obrascheniya: 12.11.2015).

10. Vasin L.A., Hlynin E.V. Razvitie parka tehnologicheskogo oborudovaniya dlya povysheniya ustoychivosti funkcionirovaniya predpriyatiya // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gos. un-ta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2011. № 1-1. S. 91.

11. Gusev D.V., Mamonov Yu.V. Ustoychivost' proizvodstvenno-hozyaystvennyh sistem: suschnost', pokazateli, statisticheskoe izmerenie // Vestnik NGUEU. 2012. № 2. S. 38.

12. Besekerskiy V.A., Popov E.P. Teoriya sistem avtomaticheskogo regulirovaniya. M.: Nauka, 1972. 768 s.

13. Pospelov G.S., Irikov V.A. Programmno-celevoe planirovanie i upravlenie. M.: Sov. radio, 1976. 440 s.

14. Raynshke K. Modeli nadezhnosti i chuvstvitel'nosti sistem. M.: Mir, 1979. 452 s.

15. Makova M.M. Metodicheskie osnovy ocenki ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiy neftyanogo kompleksa // Vestnik VEGU. 2012. № 4 (60). S. 54.

© journals.igps.ru
Support Powered by Editorum,  Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot password?