Currently, an important problem, both for society and for the economy of the country as a whole, remains the problem of the safety of water bodies, especially dams and other hydraulic structures. To date, there are more than 29 thousand hydraulic structures in the Russian Federation. The destruction of such facilities is of both defense, economic and social significance for the country, as well as a potential danger to the health and life of the population, as well as the entire natural environment. About 100 million people live in the zone of possible impact of damaging factors. Based on this, we can conclude that there is a need to minimize the probability of such events. Recently, the use of new innovative methods of monitoring hydraulic structures, including mathematical methods, has been intensively developing. In this paper, an analysis of approaches to modeling the occurrence, development and elimination of emergencies at hydraulic engineering facilities is carried out. Methods of mathematical modeling and forecasting of the situation in case of emergency situations at hydraulic engineering facilities are considered. The technology of situational modeling of natural and man-made emergencies is considered. The features of using various calculation methods to assess the consequences and dynamics of hazardous situations at hydraulic structures are shown
analysis, hydraulic engineering structure, methods, approaches, modeling, emergency situation, mathematical modeling, model
1. Chugaev R.R. Gidrotekhnicheskie sooruzheniya. Vodoslivnye plotiny. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1978. S. 62–71.
2. Nesterov M.V. Gidrotekhnicheskie sooruzheniya. Mn.: Novoe znanie, 2006. S. 327–362.
3. Zashchita naseleniya i territorij ot chrezvychajnyh situacij: ucheb. posobie / pod obshch. red. M.I. Faleeva. Kaluga: GUP «Oblizdat», 2001. S. 52–98.
4. Akimov V.A., Lesnyh V.V., Radaev N.N. Osnovy analiza i upravleniya riskom v prirodnoj i tekhnogennoj sferah. M.: ZAO «Delovoj ekspress», 2004. S. 14–38.
5. Gusev N.N. Metodologiya sozdaniya i ekspluatacii informacionnoj sistemy monitoringa bezopasnosti zdanij i sooruzhenij opasnyh proizvodstvennyh ob"ektov i gidrotekhnicheskih sooruzhenij: dis. ... d-ra tekhn. nauk. SPb., 2008. S. 112–132.
6. Obespechenie meropriyatij i dejstvij sil likvidacii chrezvychajnyh situacij. Ch. 2. Kn. 2. Operativnoe prognozirovanie inzhenernoj obstanovki v chrezvychajnyh situaciyah / V.A. Akat'ev [i dr.] / pod obshch. red. S.K. Shojgu. M.: ZAO «Firma «Papirus», 1998. S. 76–95.
7. Sozdanie intellektual'nyh informacionnyh sistem operativnogo prognozirovaniya rechnyh navodnenij / A.M. Alabyan [i dr.] // Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2016. T. 86. № 2. S. 27–44.
8. Aref'eva E.V. Podtoplenie ob"ektov i zastroennyh territorij kak potencial'nyj istochnik chrezvychajnyh situacij // Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo. 2007. № 10. S. 14–33.
9. Model'no-orientirovannaya sistema operativnogo prognozirovaniya rechnyh navodnenij / V.A. Zelencov [i dr.] // Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2019. T. 89. № 8. S. 831–843.
10. Yamalov I.U. Modelirovanie processov upravleniya i prinyatiya reshenij v usloviyah chrezvychajnyh situacij. M.: Laboratoriya bazovyh znanij, 2013. S. 113–155.
11. An energy and mass model of snow cover suitable for operational and avalanche forecasting / G. Petaccia [et al.] // Journal of Hydroinformatic. 2013. № 15 (1). P. 120–137.
12. Shaptala V.G., Radouckij V.Yu., Shaptala V.V. Osnovy modelirovaniya chrezvychajnyh situacij: ucheb. posobie / pod obshch. red. V.G. Shaptaly. Belgorod: Izd-vo BGTU, 2010. S. 50–77.
13. Samarskij A.A., Mihajlov A.P. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie. Idei. Metody. Primery. M.: Fizmatlit, 2002. S. 122–160.
14. Matveev A.V. Metody modelirovaniya i prognozirovaniya. SPb.: S.-Peterb. un-t GPS MCHS Rossii, 2022. 230 s. ISBN 978-5-907116-73-3. EDN IMLKWS.
15. Perevalov A.S. Matematicheskie modeli upravleniya poiskovo-spasatel'nymi podrazdeleniyami MCHS na vnutrennih vodoemah: avtoref. dis. ... kand. tekhn. nauk. SPb., 2013. S. 20–22.
16. Pospelov D.A. Situacionnoe upravlenie: teoriya i praktika. M.: Nauka, 1986. S. 144–121.
17. Edamenko A.S., Lezhanko V.A. Diagnostika opasnostej gidrotekhnicheskih sooruzhenij na primere Belgorodskogo vodohranilishcha // Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoj bezopasnosti. 2020. Vyp. 2 (88). S. 63–73.
18. Belov P.G., Kiseleva Yu.V. Prognozirovanie i snizhenie riska chrezvychajnyh situacij, vyzvannyh razgermetizaciej gidrotekhnicheskih sooruzhenij // Global'naya i nacional'nye strategii upravleniya riskami katastrof i stihijnyh bedstvij. 2015. S. 47.
19. Belov P.G. Apriornaya ocenka i snizhenie riska avarii gidrotekhnicheskogo sooruzheniya na osnove modelirovaniya // Bezopasnost' truda v promyshlennosti. 2019. № 2. S. 26–34.
20. Suvorova E.S. Modelirovanie zon zatoplenij na primere gidrotekhnicheskoj avarii v g. Dubna // Bol'shaya studencheskaya konferenciya. 2022. S. 69–73.
21. Vasilenko A.A. Gidrodinamicheskie avarii i ih modelirovanie // Pozharnaya bezopasnost': problemy i perspektivy. 2017. № 8. S. 119–125.
22. Striganova M.Yu. Metody ocenki i prognozirovanie posledstvij pri razrushenii gidrotekhnicheskih sooruzhenij // Vestnik Komandno-inzhenernogo instituta MCHS Respubliki Belarus'. 2012. № 1 (15). S. 10–21.
