Russian Federation
employee
Nacional'nyy otkrytyy institut (Head of the Department)
Russian Federation
Today, changes in the geophysical environment, which includes the technical environment, increase the risk of natural and man-made accidents, because there is a synergistic effect of interaction between these environments. Therefore, it is very important to use scientifically based approaches to modeling and forecasting accidents and emergencies, as well as to assess the risk of their occurrence in certain territories. The analysis of risks and sources of man-made hazards was carried out, taking into account the influence of territorial factors. The article demonstrates the application of the analysis of hierarchies method for effectively ranking six most important criteria of man-made hazards in terms of their significance.
factors of man-made hazards, man-made emergencies, risk assessment, hierarchy analysis method, and priority vector
1. Kozhar V.V., Skrashchuk N.D. Promyshlennyj simbioz: klassifikaciya i opyt dlya Belarusi. Klyuchevye pozicii i tochki razvitiya ekonomiki i promyshlennosti: nauka i praktika. // Lipeck: Lipeckij gosudarstvennyj tekhnicheskij universitetyu. 2022. S. 226–230.
2. Karanina E.V., Kartavyh K.E. Ekologicheskie aspekty ustojchivogo razvitiya regiona // Problemy analiza riska. 2023. T. 20. №1. S. 26–35.
3. Towards the Circular Economy: An Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. URL: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-1-an-economic-and-business-rationale-for-a-an (data obrashcheniya: 12.04.2026).
4. Strategiya razvitiya ekonomiki zamknutogo cikla do 2025 goda.URL: https://pravo.by/document (data obrashcheniya: 31.01.2026).
5. O klassifikacii chrezvychajnyh situacij prirodnogo i tekhnogennogo haraktera: postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Ros. Federacii ot 21 maya 2007 g. № 304. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6. Il'yasova A.I. Ocenka tekhnogennogo riska magistral'nogo gazoprovoda s uchetom vozdejstviya magnitnogo polya pri provedenii vnutritrubnoj defektoskopii // Ufa. FGBOU VO «Ufimskij gosudarstvennyj neftyanoj tekhnicheskij universitet» 2022. 24 s.
7. Tatarincev S.A. Metodika geoekologicheskoj ocenki riska proyavleniya tekhnogennyh opasnostej v aridnyh territoriyah// Voronezh. Voenno-uchebnyj centr VVS «Voenno-vozdushnaya akademiya professora N.E.Zhukovskogo i Yu.A.Gagarina» MO RF. 2024.
8. Kulagin A.V., Zykin S.A. Tekhnologii upravleniya tekhnogennymi riskami // Izhevsk: Udmurtskij universitet. 2022. 87 s.
9. Sytdykov M.R., Balobanov A.A., Ivanov A.V. Ocenka stepeni ushcherba pri avariyah magistral'nyh truboprovodov metodom analiza ierarhij // ««Vestnik S.-Peterb. un-ta GPS MChS Rossii». 2023. №3. S. 36–44.
10. Pekarskaya O.A., Luk'yanov A.G. Metodika rascheta zony chrezvychajnoj situacii pri zatoplenii // Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski (fiziko-matematicheskie i prikladnye aspekty). 2022. № 1. S. 13–19.
11. Pekarskaya O.A., Rybakova I.V. Analiz matematicheskih modelej, opisyvayushchih formirovanie gornyh selevyh potokov // Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski (fiziko-matematicheskie i prikladnye aspekty). 2022. №1. S. 30–39.
12. Strizhak A.Yu., Volokobinskij M.Yu. Primenenie mnogokriterial'nogo metoda vybora al'ternativ pri ranzhirovanii marketplejsov pokupatelyami // Novoe v ekonomicheskoj kibernetike. 2024. № 4. S. 41–52.
13. Volokobinskij M.Yu., Vyhodcev S.A. Metody ocenki ekonomicheskogo ushcherba ot chrezvychajnyh situacij tekhnogennogo i prirodnogo haraktera // Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski (fiziko-matematicheskie i prikladnye aspekty). 2025. № 3 (55). S. 45–54.
14. O povyshenii indeksa soglasovannosti matricy parnyh sravnenij v sistemah podderzhki prinyatiya reshenij / A.E.Kurennyh [i dr.] // Preprinty IPM im. M.V.Keldysha. 2018. № 196. 16 s. URL: http://library.keldysh.ru/preprint.asp (data obrashcheniya 12.04.2026).
15. Strizhak A.Yu., Pekarskaya O.A. Problemy social'noj inzhenerii v kiberprostranstve: regional'nyj aspekt // Innovacionnaya paradigma ekonomicheskih mekhanizmov hozyajstvovaniya: sb. materialov IX Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Simferopol', 2024. S. 621–623.
