The article deals with the problem of reducing the influence of the human factor during the selection of fire-technical equipment, to improve the technical equipping of departments of EMERCOM of Russia. There is proposed the complex criterion of relative general utility based on objective values of fire-technical equipment usage in the departments of EMERCOM of Russia. Its contents, the general scheme of choosing the preferred fire-technical equipment and the algorithm for its realization are disclosed on the example of hydraulic rescue tool.
probability of failure-free working, fire-technical armament, fire-technical equipment, selection, reliability, risk of death, damage, relative total benefits
1. Koncepciya obschestvennoy bezopasnosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii (utv. Prezidentom Ros. Federacii 14 noyab. 2013 g. № Pr-2685) // Zakony, kodeksy i normativno-pravovye akty Ros. Federacii. URL: http://legalacts.ru/doc/kontseptsija-obshchestvennoi-bezopasnosti-v-rossiiskoi-federatsii-utv/ (data obrascheniya: 23.05.2018).
2. O federal'noy celevoy programme «Povyshenie bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya v 2013-2020 godah»: postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Ros. Federacii ot 3 okt. 2013 g. № 864 (s izm. ot 13 dek. 2017 g.). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Garant».
3. Ob utverzhdenii Strategii razvitiya grazhdanskoy oborony, zaschity naseleniya i territoriy ot chrezvychaynyh situaciy, obespecheniya pozharnoy bezopasnosti i bezopasnosti lyudey na vodnyh ob'ektah na period do 2030 goda: proekt Ukaza Prezidenta Ros. Federacii (podgot. MChS Rossii 20 apr. 2018 g.). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Garant».
4. Ingargiola G.P., Korsh J.F. Reduction algorithm for zero-one single knapsack problems // Management Science. 1973. Vol. 20. pp. 460-463.
5. Ptuskin A.S., Levner E.V. Vybor antiriskovyh programm dlya umen'sheniya poter' v cepyah postavok // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta im. N.E. Baumana. Ser.: Mashinostroenie. 2014. № 3 (96). S. 119-135.
6. Psarros G., Skjong R., Eide M. S. The acceptability of maritime security risk // Journal of Transportation Security. 2009. Vol. 2. Issue 4. pp. 149-163.
7. Saati T. Prinyatie resheniy. Metod analiza ierarhiy. M.: Radio i svyaz'. 1993. 278 s.
8. Roenko V.V., Tarakanov D.V., Shkunov S.A. Kriterii ocenki variantov pereosnascheniya podrazdeleniy MChS Rossii // Internet-zhurnal «Tehnologii tehnosfernoy bezopasnosti». 2014. Vyp. № 6 (58).
9. Roenko V.V., Tarakanov D.V., Shkunov S.A. Metodika ocenki variantov pereosnascheniya podrazdeleniy MChS Rossii na primere sub'ektov SKRC MChS Rossii // Pozhary i chrezvychaynye situacii: predotvraschenie, likvidaciya. 2015. № 3. S. 31-35.
10. Odincov L.G., Krutelev V.G. Gidravlicheskiy avariyno-spasatel'nyy instrument // Protivopozharnye i avariyno-spasatel'nye sredstva. 2004. № 2.
11. Odincov L.G., Todoseychuk S.P., Paramonov V.V. Sravnitel'naya ocenka effektivnosti GASI // Protivopozharnye i avariyno-spasatel'nye sredstva. 2005. № 3.
12. Filanovskiy A.M. Metodika kompleksnoy ocenki effektivnosti gidravlicheskogo avariyno-spasatel'nogo instrumenta, primenyaemogo pri likvidacii posledstviy chrezvychaynyh situaciy na transporte: dis. … kand. tehn. nauk. SPb., 2013. 124 s.
13. Malygin I.G., Sal'nikov S.N. Metody prinyatiya resheniya pri razrabotke novyh obrazcov pozharnoy tehniki: monografiya / pod obsch. red. V.S. Artamonova. SPb., 2002. 87 s.
14. Lelikov O.P. Osnovy rascheta i proektirovaniya detaley i uzlov mashin. Konspekt lekciy po kursu «Detali mashin». M.: Mashinostroenie, 2007. 464 s.
