Russian Federation
Russian Federation
On the characteristic features of everyday and scientific types of knowledge, their interaction (interrelation and difference) in the historical aspect is studied. The problem is analyzed on the basis of historical and philosophical material. The difference and relationship between everyday practical and scientific types of knowledge is illustrated by examples of acquired knowledge from various fields of science. Particular attention is paid to the comparative characteristics of the language of science and the language of everyday knowledge. The analysis carried out allows us to avoid extremes – both the absolute opposition of these types of cognition and their fusion. The attributes of scientific knowledge – rationalistic elements (argumentation and proof, methodological approach, universality, etc.) – are complemented by irrationalistic elements (faith, intuition, etc.), without which no scientific research is possible. The use of the dialectical method of analysis can be a sufficient basis for criticizing anti-scientism and reduce the currently increasing intensity of criticism of science.
cience, criterion of scientific character, features of scientific knowledge, types of knowledge, everyday knowledge, truth, essence and phenomenon, faith, methodology, law, language of science
1. Mezhuev V.M. Ideya kul'tury. Ocherki po filosofii kul'tury: monografiya. M.: Izd-vo «Universitetskaya kniga», 2012. 406 s.
2. Sily Van der Vaal'sa. URL: https:// obrazovanie-gid.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.05.2023).
3. Chto takoe dozhd'? URL: https://rosuchebnik.ru/material/chto-takoe-dozhd/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2023).
4. Marks K. Kapital. M.: Izd-vo polit. literatury., 1961. T. 3. Ch. 2.
5. Sergeev D.V. Ontologiya kul'turnogo smysla. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2009. 167 s.
6. Markov B.V. Znaki bytiya. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. 149 s.
7. SHul'ga E.N. Ponimanie i interpretaciya. M.: Nauka, 2008. 318 s.
8. Maks Veber. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 707-735.
9. Fejerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki. CH. 3. Protiv metodologicheskogo prinuzhdeniya. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/4745/4761 (data obrashcheniya: 30.04.2023).
10. Al'ternativnye miry znaniya. SPb.: Izd-vo Russkogo Hristianskogo guman. in-ta. 2000. 327 s.
