Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The purpose of the article is to develop a system for scoring the contributions of various technical and organizational measures to the magnitude of the risk of an accident based on existing approaches to the fire risk assessment at hazardous production facilities. To achieve the goal of the study and the formation of a score in cooperation with the organization operating the storage tanks of substances under pressure, a number of influencing factors were obtained. The following methods were applied in the work: analysis of hierarchies, comparison, analogy, study of documents and results of activities. The result of the work is the developed scoring system with groups of factors influencing the probability of an emergency and the resulting weight coefficients of the groups and the factors themselves. A method for point-factor estimation of the frequency of events initiating fire hazardous situations for underground liquefied petroleum gas tanks operated at gas filling stations is proposed. The results obtained can be used in assessing the fire risk for facilities where accidents can occur associated with the formation of an explosive and fire hazardous situation.
reservoir, accident, probability, liquefied petroleum gas, fire risk
1. Polyuhovich M.A. Risk-orientirovannyj podhod v upravlenii promyshlennoj bezopasnost'yu // Bezopasnost' v chrezvychajnyh situaciyah: sb. nauch. trudov IX Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. SPb.: S.-Peterb. politekhn. un-ta Petra Velikogo, 2017. S. 121-125.
2. Efremov S.V., Ul'yanov A.I., Ul'yanova A.G. Razrabotka podhoda k ocenke effektivnosti upravleniya professional'nymi riskami // XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoyashchego plyus. 2022. T. 11. № 4 (60). S. 233-237.
3. Podhody k ocenke professional'nogo riska / N.V. Rumyanceva [i dr.] // Nauchnye trudy KubGTU. 2019. № 3. S. 441-448. EDN KGXTMD.
4. Orlovskij P.S. Analiz sushchestvuyushchih norm i trebovanij v oblasti proektirovaniya i ekspluatacii ob"ektov nefteproduktoobespecheniya // Novye materialy, oborudovanie i tekhnologii v promyshlennosti: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-tekhn. konf. molodyh uchenyh. Mogilev: Belorus.-Ros. un-t, 2021. S. 130.
5. Orlovskij P.S. Vliyanie osobennostej proektov AZS na velichinu riska avarii // Novye materialy, oborudovanie i tekhnologii v promyshlennosti: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-tekhn. konf. molodyh uchenyh. Mogilev: Belorus.-Ros. un-t, 2022. S. 125.
6. Saati T.L. Prinyatie reshenij. Metod analiza ierarhij: per. s angl. M.: Radio i svyaz', 1993. 320 s.
7. Ob utverzhdenii metodiki opredeleniya raschetnyh velichin pozharnogo riska na proizvodstvennyh ob"ektah: prikaz MCHS Rossii ot 10 iyulya 2009 g. № 404 (v red. ot 14 dek. 2010 g.). Dostup iz inf.-pravovogo portala «Garant».
8. Ob utverzhdenii Rukovodstva po bezopasnosti «Metodicheskie osnovy analiza opasnostej i ocenki riska avarij na opasnyh proizvodstvennyh ob"ektah»: prikaz Rostekhnadzora ot 3 marta 2022 g. № 387. Dostup iz inf.-pravovogo portala «Garant».
9. Ob utverzhdenii federal'nyh norm i pravil v oblasti promyshlennoj bezopasnosti «Osnovnye trebovaniya k provedeniyu nerazrushayushchego kontrolya tekhnicheskih ustrojstv, zdanij i sooruzhenij na opasnyh proizvodstvennyh ob"ektah»: prikaz Rostekhnadzora ot 1 dek. 2020 g. № 478. Dostup iz inf.-pravovogo portala «Garant».
10. Ob utverzhdenii Rukovodstva po bezopasnosti «Metodika ocenki riska avarij na opasnyh proizvodstvennyh ob"ektah magistral'nogo truboprovodnogo transporta gaza»: prikaz Rostekhnadzora ot 22 dek. 2022 g. № 454. Dostup iz inf.-pravovogo portala «Garant».
11. Primenenie metoda imitacionnogo modelirovaniya dlya rascheta i ocenki pozharnogo riska zdaniya / M.O. Avdeeva [i dr.] // XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoyashchego plyus. 2022. T. 11. № 3 (59). S. 170-175.
12. Kolesnikov E.Yu. Sposoby kolichestvennoj ocenki i umen'sheniya neopredelennosti avarijnogo riska vzryvopozharoopasnyh ob"ektov // Nadezhnost'. 2020. T. 20. № 3. S. 61-67.
13. Kolesnikov E.Yu. Problemy risk-orientirovannogo podhoda // Problemy analiza riska. 2021. T. 18. № 6. S. 84-92.
14. Kolesnikov E.Yu., Filippidis V. Neobhodimost' ucheta neopredelennosti pri kolichestvennoj ocenke pozharnogo riska // Pozharnaya bezopasnost'. 2022. № 4 (109). S. 89-98.
15. Marques R.O., de Vasconcelos V. Risk Management // VII Annual scientific initiation seminar of the nuclear technology development center abstract book. S. 29.
16. Jin Jun. Risk assessment method for vapor cloud explosion accident // Fire technology and product information. 2014. № 12. S. 25-27.
17. Liu, Kui, Shin. Application of the TNO multienergy method to estimate the blast resistance requirements of buildings in petrochemical companies. 2021. T. 51. № 3. S. 69.
18. System of controlling the reliability of hydraulic machinery in oil and gas facilities / M.Yu. Zemenkova [et al.] // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 2016. T. 127. № 1. S. 012055.
19. Zhang B., Liu Y., Qiao S. A quantitative individual risk assessment method in process facilities with toxic gas release hazards: a combined scenario set and CFD approach // Process safety progress. 2019. T. 38. № 1. S. 52-60.
20. Menon E.S. Pipeline planning and construction field manual. Elsevier Inc., 2011. S. 552.
21. Transportation research board special report 324 Designing Safety Regulations for High-Hazard Industries. Washington: The National Academies Press, 2018.
22. Steel pipelines for high pressure gas transmission // Institution of Gas Engineers and Managers. 2021. IGEM/TSP/21/006.
