Russian Federation
Due to the increasing pace of renovation, the volume of work on the demolition of real estate objects is increasing. In the process of dismantling structures, there are threats and risks of environmental hazards caused by the man-made impact of the dismantling processes. A significant technospheric danger is the formation of toxic waste. Based on a systematic analysis of demolition methods and technologies, the paper proposes an organizational and technical scheme for the separate collection and accumulation of waste from dismantled objects, based on the principles of resource conservation, reuse of waste resource components, ensuring the prevention of environmental hazards in the sources of its formation.
environmental safety, threats, risks, technosphere, waste, dismantling of facilities, secondary resources, resource conservation
1. Ckhovrebov E.S. Ekologo-ekonomicheskie aspekty planirovaniya razmeshcheniya i proektirovaniya promyshlennyh ob"ektov po obrabotke, utilizacii, obezvrezhivaniyu othodov // Vestnik MGSU. 2018. № 11 (122). S. 1326–1340.
2. Tskhovrebov E., Velichko E., Niyazgulov U. Planning measures for environmentally safe handling with extremely and highly hazardous wastes in industrial, building and transport complex // Materials Science Forum. 2019. T. 945. P. 988–994.
3. Ckhovrebov E.S. Formirovanie regional'nyh strategij upravleniya obrashcheniem s vtorichnymi resursami // Vestnik MGSU. 2019. T. 14. № 4 (127). S. 450–463.
4. Aleksandrov A.B. Snos zdanij i pererabotka stroitel'nogo musora // Stroitel'nye materialy, oborudovanie, tekhnologii HKHI veka. 2013. № 1. S. 5–10.
5. Grigor'eva L.S. Perspektivy pererabotki stroitel'nyh othodov // Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2015. № 6. S. 590–592.
6. Vladimirov S.N. Problemy pererabotki othodov stroitel'noj industrii // Sistemnye tekhnologii. 2016. № 19. S. 101–105.
7. Lunev G.G. Razvitie metodologii kompleksnogo ispol'zovaniya vtorichnyh stroitel'nyh resursov. M.: OOO «Nauchtekhizdat», 2019. 284 s.
8. Olejnik S.P., Chulkov V.O. Upravlenie obrashcheniem s othodami stroitel'stva i snosa // Othody i resursy. 2016. T. 3. № 1.
9. Volynkina E.P. Analiz sostoyaniya i problem pererabotki tekhnogennyh othodov v Rossii // Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. № 2 (20). S. 45–58.
10. Grafkina M.V., Potapov A.D. Ocenka ekologicheskoj bezopasnosti stroitel'nyh sistem kak prirodno-tekhnogennyh kompleksov // Vestnik MGSU. 2008. № 1. S. 23–28.
11. Sovershenstvovanie sredstv kollektivnoj zashchity naseleniya v sovremennyh usloviyah / G.P. Tonkih [i dr.] // Tekhnologii grazhdanskoj bezopasnosti. 2016. T. 13. № 4 (50). S. 69.
12. Ocenka ushcherba chrezvychajnyh situacij / M.I. Lomakin [i dr.] // Teoriya i praktika grazhdanskoj zashchity na strazhe bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel'nosti sovremennogo obshchestva: sb. M., 2022. S. 32–36.
13. Muzalevskij A.A., Karlin L.N. Ekologicheskie riski: teoriya i praktika. SPb.: RGGMU, 2011. 448 s.
14. Akimov V.A., Lesnyh V.V., Radaev N.N. Osnovy analiza i upravleniya riskom v prirodnoj i tekhnogennoj sferah. M.: Finansovyj izdatel'skij dom «Delovoj ekspress», 2004. 352 s.
15. Bashkin V.N. Ekologicheskie riski. Raschet, upravlenie, strahovanie. M.: Vyssh. shk., 2007. 352 s.
16. Domenech T., Bahn-Walkowiak B. Transition Towards a Resource Efficient Circular Economy in Europe: Policy Lessons from the EU and the Member States // Ecological Economics. 2019. Vol. 155. P. 7–19.
17. Elgizawy S., El-Haggar S., Nassar K. Slum Development Using Zero Waste Concepts: Construction Waste Case Study // Procedia Engineering. 2016. Vol. 145. P. 1306–1313.
18. Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions // Resources, Conservation & Recycling. 2017. № 127. P. 9.
19. Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: thecase of the built environment / J. Hart [et al.] // Procedia CIRP. 2019. № 80. P. 619–624.
20. Goldstein B., Rasmussen F. LCA of Buildings and the Built Environment. Life Cycle Assessment // Theory and Practice. 2018. Sh. 28. P. 695–720.
