UDC 624.21 UDC 534.1 UDC 519.876.5

DEVELOPMENT OF A PROBABILISTIC METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY OF A NATURAL-TECHNICAL SYSTEM BASED ON THE RELIABILITY INDEX Β (CASE STUDY: THE VOLGOGRAD BRIDGE) DEVELOPMENT OF A PROBABILISTIC METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY OF A NATURAL-TECHNICAL SYSTEM BASED ON THE RELIABILITY INDEX β (CASE STUDY: THE VOLGOGRAD BRIDGE)

Published in Problems of risk management in the technosphere · Issue 3, 2026 · Pages 229–247 · Rubric: Environmental safety
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61260/1998-8990-2026-3-229-247
Received: 30.03.2026 Accepted: 27.07.2026 Published: 05.10.2026
Authors
The study aims to justify the transition from deterministic methods of assessing the aeroelastic stability of long-span girder bridge structures to a probabilistic paradigm based on the reliability index β (ISO 2394) and stochastic simulation. The Volgogradsky Bridge across the Volga River, which experienced intense flutter-type aeroelastic oscillations with amplitudes up to 400 mm at a frequency of 0,42 Hz on May 20, 2010, was selected as the research object. The methods include physical experiments in a hydrodynamic tunnel with Karman vortex street visualization, mathematical simulation in ANSYS CFX using the Menter SST turbulence model, Strouhal number and critical velocity determination, and Monte Carlo probabilistic analysis. The Strouhal number was found to be Sh = 0,13–0,15, with resonance occurring at wind velocities of 13–15 m/s. Application of the reliability index β revealed a critical gap between deterministic (β_det) and stochastic (β_stoch) assessments, with Pf increasing from 0,39 % to 25,3 %. A BEE–β environmental safety matrix was developed, formalizing «greenwashing» and target stability zones. Investment in vibration dampers raises β to 4,5 with a 1:9 cost-effectiveness ratio.
vortex flutter, aeroelastic stability, Volgogradsky bridge, reliability index β, failure probability, Monte Carlo method, stochastic modeling, environmental safety
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Kavrakov I., Morgenthal G. A comparative assessment of aerodynamic models for buffeting and flutter of long-span bridges // Engineering. 2017. Vol. 3 (6). P. 823–838. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.11.008

2. Ji X., Huang G., Zhao Yu. Probabilistic flutter analysis of bridge considering aerodynamic and structural parameter uncertainties // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2020. Vol. 201. P. 104168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104168

3. Hobbs R.S. Catastrophe to Triumph: Bridges of the Tacoma Narrows // Pullman: Washington State University Press. 2006. 280 p.

4. Smirnova E.E. Ekologicheskie riski v stroitel'stve: model' otkazov // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo arhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. Ser.: Stroitel'stvo i arhitektura. 2025. Vyp. 3 (100). S. 145–156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35211/18154360_2025_3_145

5. Arioli G., Gazzola F. A new mathematical explanation of what triggered the catastrophic torsional mode of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge // Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2015. Vol. 39 (2). P. 901–912. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.06.022

6. Smirnova E. Analysis of long-span bridge fluctuations for finding its optimal safe operation // E3S Web of Conferences. 2020. Vol. 157. P. 06038. DOI: 1051/e3sconf/202015706038

7. Chislennoe modelirovanie poperechnogo obtekaniya proletnyh stroenij balochnyh mostov / Yu.A. Gosteev [i dr.] // Vestnik Don. gos. tekhn. un-ta. 2018. T. 18. № 4. S. 362–378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.23947/1992-5980-2018-18-4-362-378

8. Dowell E.H. A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity. Cham: Springer, 2015. 874 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09453-3

9. Ge Yu., Tanaka H. Long-span bridge aerodynamics // Advanced Structural Wind Engineering / Ed. Yu. Tamura, A. Kareem. Tokyo: Springer, 2013. P. 85–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54337-4_4

10. Argentini T., Rocchi D., Somaschini C. Effect of the low-frequency turbulence on the aeroelastic response of a long-span bridge in wind tunnel // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2020. Vol. 197. P. 104072. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104072

11. Poddaeva O., Fedosova A., Gribach J. The study of wind effects on the bridge constructions // E3S Web of Conferences. 2019. Vol. 97. P. 03030. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199703030

12. Churin P., Fedosova A. Analysis of normative and scientific and technical documents in the field of testing bridge structures for wind loads // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. Vol. 365 (5). P. 052009. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/365/5/052009

13. Matter Yu.S., Darabseh T.T., Mourad A.-H.I. Flutter analysis of a viscoelastic tapered wing under bending–torsion loading // Meccanica. 2018. Vol. 53 (15). P. 3673–3691. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0915-2

14. Experimental investigation of flutter characteristics of shallow section at post-critical regime / Yu. Tang [et al.] // Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2019. Vol. 88. P. 275–291. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.05.010

15. Proske D. Bridge Collapse Frequencies versus Failure Probabilities (Ser: Risk Engineering). Cham: Springer, 2018. 126 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73833-8

16. Petinov S.V. In-Service Fatigue Reliability of Structures (Ser: SMIA. Vol. 251). Cham: Springer, 2018. 201 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89318-1

17. A novel two-degree-of-freedom model of nonlinear self-excited force for coupled flutter instability of bridge decks / G. Gao [et al.] // Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2020. Vol. 480. P. 115406. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115406

18. ISO 2394:2015. General Principles on Reliability for Structures. Geneva: ISO, 2015. 111 p.

19. Smirnova E.E., Slesarev M.Yu., Mozaffari M.A. Scenarnyj podhod k ocenke riskov dlya obespecheniya ekologicheskoj bezopasnosti v stroitel'stve // Sovremennye problemy grazhdanskoj zashchity. 2024. № 2 (51). S. 173–190.

20. Vairo G. Modeling wind loads on long-span bridges // International Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2016. Special Issue. P. 221–259.

21. Ovchinnikov I.I., Ovchinnikov I.G., Filippova V.O. Tancuyushchij most v Volgograde: prichiny, analogii, meropriyatiya. Chast' 1. Prichiny // Vestnik evrazijskoj nauki. 2015. Vol. 7. № 6 (31). P. 146. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15862/07KO615

22. Ovchinnikov I.I., Ovchinnikov I.G., Filippova V.O. Tancuyushchij most v Volgograde: prichiny, analogii, meropriyatiya. Chast' 2. Analogii, meropriyatiya // Vestnik evrazijskoj nauki. 2015. Vol. 7. № 6 (31). P. 147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15862/08KO615

23. Gosteev Yu.A., Obuhovskij A.D., Salenko S.D. Vliyanie formy na aerodinamicheskie harakteristiki balochnyh mostov // Inzhenerno-stroitel'nyj zhurnal. 2014. № 5 (49). S. 63–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5862/MCE.49.7

24. Deng L., Wang W., Yu Yu. State-of-the-art review on the causes and mechanisms of bridge collapse // Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2016. Vol. 30 (2). P. 04015005. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000731

25. Proske D. Bridge Collapse Frequencies versus Failure Probabilities (Ser: Risk Engineering). Cham: Springer, 2019. 126 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73833-8

26. Guzeev A.S. Vertikal'naya gidrodinamicheskaya truba kak rabochij instrument v sudostroitel'nom eksperimente // Trudy Krylovskogo gosudarstvennogo nauchnogo centra. 2020. № 4 (394). S. 53–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24937/2542-2324-2020-4-394-53-62

27. Werlé H. Le tunnel hydrodynamique au service de la recherche aérospatiale // ONERA Public. 1974. № 156. P. 1–83.

28. Salenko S.D., Obukhovskiy A.D., Gosteev Yu.A. Aerodynamic studies of the beam bridge // AIP Conference Proceedings. 2017. Vol. 1893. P. 030076. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007534

29. Ahmad S., ul Islam S., Nazeer G. Numerical investigation of Strouhal number discontinuity and flow characteristics around single rectangular cylinder at low aspect ratios and Reynolds numbers // Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2021. Vol. 43(6). P. 315. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03040-22021

30. Thermal engineering visualization of a flow in a spherical dimple built in the lower wall of the rectangular-section channel of a water tunnel and numerical identification of the vortex-jet structures in it / S.A. Isaev [et al.] // Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics. 2015. Vol. 88. P. 452–470. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-015-1210-x

31. Izhar A., Qureshi A.H., Khushnood S. Simulation of vortex-induced vibrations of a cylinder using ANSYS CFX rigid body solver// China Ocean Engineering. 2017. Vol. 31. № 1. P. 79–90.

32. Aerodynamic study of a suspension bridge deck by CFD simulations, wind tunnel tests and full-scale observations / I. Kusano [et al.] // IOP Conference Ser.: Material Science Engineering. 2021. Vol. 1201. P. 012007.

33. Unsteady RANS simulations of flow around a twin-box bridge girder cross section / W. Jeong [et al.] // Energies. 2019. Vol. 12 (14). P. 2670. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/en12142670

34. Ustrojstvo dlya snizheniya poperechnyh kolebanij proletnogo stroeniya mostov, vyzvannyh vetrovym vozdejstviem: pat. 2500852 Ros. Federaciya № 2011141140/03 / Guzeev A.S., Korotkin A.I., Pashin V.M. [i dr.]; zayavl. 11.10.2011; opubl. 10.12.2013, Byul. № 34. 8 s.

35. Sarwar M.W., Ishihara T. Numerical study on suppression of vortex-induced vibrations of box girder bridge section by aerodynamic countermeasures // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2010. Vol. 98 (12). P. 701–711. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.001

36. Evaluation of ride comfort under vortex-induced vibration of long-span bridge / Yu. Wang [et al.] // Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13 (20). P. 11505. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011505

37. Lee H.S., Kim J.H. Wind pressure statistics and target reliability index for wind load-governed limit state of reliability-based bridge design codes // KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2019. Vol. 23. P. 2263–2271. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1283-8

38. Salenko S.D., Obuhovskij A.D., Telkova Yu.V. Gashenie aerouprugih kolebanij proletnogo stroeniya mosta cherez reku Ob' // V mire nauchnyh otkrytij. Ser.: Matematika. Mekhanika. Informatika. 2011. № 1 (13). S. 167–176.