UDC 343.9

PROBLEMS OF DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN PORNOGRAPHY AND EROTICA IN THE CONTEXT OF CRIMINAL LAW QUALIFICATION

Published in LAW. SAFETY. EMERGENCY SITUATIONS · Issue 3, 2026 · Pages 126–134 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61260/2074-1626-2026-3-126-134
Received: 23.03.2026 Accepted: 17.09.2026 Published: 05.10.2026
This article addresses a pressing issue in criminal law doctrine and law enforcement: distinguishing between the concepts of «pornography» and «erotica», which is crucial for the proper classification of crimes against public morality. The paper substantiates the need to develop objective criteria for differentiating these categories to eliminate subjectivity and ensure a balance between constitutional artistic freedom and the protection of the nation's moral health. In the course of the study, the authors applied a range of methodological approaches, including general scientific methods (systemic-structural analysis, generalization) and specialized legal methods. Key problematic aspects of qualification under Articles 242–242.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation have been identified and examined, such as the absence of legal definitions in the criminal law, the excessive dependence of the court on the subjective conclusions of comprehensive expert examinations, and the blurring of the boundaries between art and prohibited content in the context of digital transformation.. The obtained results allowed the formulation of specific proposals for improving legislation and investigative practice. Thus, the main measures for resolving the identified problems include the developed author's criteria for distinguishing between pornography and erotica.
pornography, eroticism, distinction, aesthetics, artistic value, distinction criteria, public morality, evaluative categories
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Vitruk P.A. Problemnye aspekty kvalifikacii prestuplenij, svyazannyh s oborotom pornograficheskih materialov v seti Internet // Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2021. T. 11. № 8A. S. 137–147.

2. Sharapov R.D. Voprosy kvalifikacii prestuplenij, svyazannyh s ekspluataciej prostitucii i nezakonnym oborotom pornograficheskih materialov // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. 2023. № 1 (63). S. 22–30.

3. Yashkov S.A. O problemnyh voprosah kvalifikacii prestuplenij, svyazannyh s nezakonnym izgotovleniem i oborotom materialov ili predmetov s pornograficheskim izobrazheniem nesovershennoletnih // Vestnik Akademii Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federacii. 2022. № 2 (32). S. 113–121. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.54217/2588-0136.2022.32.2.015.

4. Gusarova M.V. Ob"ekt i predmet prestuplenij v sfere nezakonnogo izgotovleniya, rasprostraneniya i oborota pornograficheskih materialov ili predmetov: ponyatie i osobennosti kvalifikacii // Nauchnyj Tatarstan. 2009. № 3. S. 15–19.

5. Shmykov D.V. Protivodejstvie obrashcheniyu pornograficheskih materialov ili predmetov (ugolovno-pravovoj i kriminologicheskij analiz): dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2011. 200 s.

6. Bidzyan D.R. Seks-industriya kak beznravstvennyj antisocial'nyj biznes // Territoriya nauki. 2016. № 3. S. 154–159.

7. Kufleva V.N. Novelly kvalifikacii vebkam-kontenta kak publichno rasprostranyaemoj pornografii // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2023. № 3 (181). S. 127–131. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2023.3.19.

8. Mihajlova M.V., Shishkina S.G. Illyustrativnyj faktor v razgranichenii ponyatij «Erotika» i «Pornografiya» // Privolzhskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2013. № 9 (25). S. 115–120.

9. O presechenii obrashcheniya pornograficheskih izdanij i torgovle imi: Mezhdunar. konvenciya.URL: https://base.garant.ru/2540272/ (data obrashcheniya: 15.02.2026).

10. Grekov M.A. Pornografiya kak otchuzhdenie seksual'nosti v sovremennoj sociokul'turnoj real'nosti // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. № 14. S. 22–27.

11. Dzhindzholiya R.S. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe rasprostranenie pornograficheskih materialov ili predmetov. M., 2001. S. 24.

12. Dzhindzholiya R.S. Ugolovno-pravovye mery bor'by s prestupnym ispol'zovaniem pornograficheskih predmetov i proizvedenij, propagandiruyushchih kul't nasiliya i zhestokosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1998. S. 11–13.

13. Borev Yu.B. Etika i estetika. Prekrasnoe. URL: http://etika-estetika.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000004/st020.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2022).

14. Bregadze V.V. Iskusstvo i estetika bezobraznogo. Tbilisi, 1990. 377 s.

15. Borev Yu.B. Estetika. M., 1999. S. 589 s.

16. Yunda I.F. Polovaya moral' i zdorov'e cheloveka. Kiev, 1995.193 s.

17. Forel' A. Polovoj vopros. SPb., 1909. 356 s.

18. Antonyan Yu.M. Ponyatie pornografii // Nauchnyj portal MVD Rossii. 2023. № 3 (63). S. 81–86.

19. Filyar M. Iskusstvo i problema pornografii. Sztuka a zagadnitnie pornografii // NovePrawo. 1978. № 10. P. 239–248.