The concept, essence and other legal aspects of the phenomenon of «digital dementia» in minors caused by the intensive use of digital technologies are considered. Statistical data on the average time spent by minors in the Internet information and telecommunications network and the use of gadgets are presented. The article analyzes the relationship between digital time and academic performance of adolescents, as well as the relationship between the uncontrolled presence of minors online with oral sayings, communication, building logical chains and meaningful presentation of information. The risks associated with the increased vulnerability of adolescents, formed under the influence of cognitive, emotional, behavioral and social maladaptive patterns emerging in the digital environment, are investigated. Special attention is paid to the key areas of illegal activity resulting from the development of the phenomenon under study. The author's proposals on the specifics of bringing minors to criminal and administrative responsibility when using digital technologies are formulated. «Digital dementia» is a completely new phenomenon – a challenge for society and the state, which calls into question traditional legal approaches to understanding guilt, responsibility and protection of the rights of minors.
«digital dementia», minors, legal risks, involvement in criminal activities, criminal liability, cybercrime, protection of minors' rights, law enforcement practice, digital environment, vulnerability, maladaptive patterns, prevention, legislation
1. Ameninckij A.V. Aktul'naya kiberbezopasnost'. M.: Avtor, 2025. 556 s.
2. Hungbaur Daniela. Smartphone ohne Aufsicht erst ab 18 Jahren: Hirnforscher Manfred Spitzer warnt im Interview vor massiven digitalen Gefahren. URL: https://www.suedkurier.de/ueberregional/wissenschaft/Smartphone-ohne-Aufsicht-erst-ab-18-Jahren-Hirnforscher-Manfred-Spitzer-warnt-im-Interview-vor-massiven-digitalen-Gefahren (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2025).
3. Ershova R.V. Cifrovoe slaboumie kak realiya informacionnogo obshchestva // Prakticheskaya psihologiya obrazovaniya XXI veka: psihologicheskoe soprovozhdenie obrazovatel'nogo processa: sb. nauch. st. i materialov HIII Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem. M., 2015. S. 18–22.
4. Borichev K.V. Informacionnyj terrorizm: aktual'nost' i osobennosti // Pravda i zakon. 2023. № 3 (25). S. 72–80.
5. SHpitcer M. Antimozg: cifrovye tekhnologii i mozg. M.: AST, 2013. 288 s.
6. Ignatova N.Yu. Mnogozadachnost' i uspevaemost' studentov // Otkrytoe i distancionnoe obrazovanie. 2014. № 3 (55). S. 5–11.
7. Gavrilova T.N. Razvitie cifrovoj demencii: k teorii voprosa // Universum: psihologiya i obrazovanie. 2022. № 3 (93). S. 46–47.
8. Starcev M.V., Hlebnikov V.V., Dzhabrailov M.A. «Cifrovoe slaboumie» molodezhi kak problema sovremennogo obrazovaniya // Psihologo-pedagogicheskij zhurnal Gaudeamus. 2021. № 2 (48). S. 69-75.
9. Kompenrolle T. Mozg osvobozhdennyj: kak predotvratit' peregruzki i ispol'zovat' svoj potencial na polnuyu moshch'. M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2015.
10. Elyakov A.D. Blago i zlo: zhguchij paradoks Interneta // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2011. № 2. S. 58–76.
11. Kandel', E. Rasstroennaya psihika. CHto rasskazyvaet o nas neobychnyj mozg. M.: Corpus, 2018. 380 s.
12. Alekhin A.N., Grekova A.A. Osobennosti formirovaniya myshleniya v usloviyah cifrovoj sredy // Klinicheskaya i special'naya psihologiya. 2019. T. 8. № 1. C. 162–176.
