Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
Journals
Books
Monographies Textbooks
Submit manuscript
Home / Journals / LAW. SAFETY. EMERGENCY SITUATIONS / Volume 2017 Issue 4 / TO THE QUESTION OF DIFFERENTIATION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR THE CRIMES PROVIDED BY ARTICLE 264 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
TO THE QUESTION OF DIFFERENTIATION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR THE CRIMES PROVIDED BY ARTICLE 264 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text
To cite
Citations:

TO THE QUESTION OF DIFFERENTIATION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR THE CRIMES PROVIDED BY ARTICLE 264 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Agaev G A 1
Zorina E A 2
Elmurzaev A V 3
Authors:
1.  Saint-Petersburg university of Internal affairs of Russia

2.  Saint-Petersburg university of State fire service of EMERCOM of Russia

3.  Saint-Petersburg university of State fire service of EMERCOM of Russia

Type:
Article
Pages:
from 39 to 43
Status:
Published
Received:
12.12.2017
Accepted:
20.12.2017
Published:
25.12.2017
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
Criminal code of the Russian Federation, differentiation of criminal liability, careless crimes, traffic offense, ar. 264 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Questions of differentiation of criminal liability for the crimes provided to article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are considered in the article. It is proved that the existing criminal precept of law providing criminal liability for traffic offense has a number of shortcomings. Author's suggestions for improvement of the existing criminal legislation are made.

Keywords:
Criminal code of the Russian Federation, differentiation of criminal liability, careless crimes, traffic offense, ar. 264 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Sovershenstvovanie mer bor'by s prestupnost'yu v usloviyah nauchno-tehnicheskoy revolyucii / otv. red. V.N. Kudryavcev. M., 1980. S. 117.

2. Gosavtoinspekciya Ros. Federacii. URL: http://stat.gibdd.ru/ (data obrascheniya: 17.10.2017).

3. Statistika DTP v Rossii i mire. URL: http://tass.ru/info/3233185 (data obrascheniya: 17.10.2017).

4. Programma ezhegodnyh zanyatiy s voditelyami avtotransportnyh organizaciy: metod. posobie po provedeniyu ezhegod. zanyatiy s voditelyami avtotransport. sr-v. URL: http://gostrf.com/normadata/1/4293849/4293849282.htm (data obrascheniya: 27.09.2017).

5. Nikitina A.A. OSAGO, aktual'nye problemy i puti ih resheniya // Molodoy uchenyy. 2016. № 22. S. 182-184.

6. Ryzhkina E.S., Pirozhkov R.V. Analiz prichin dorozhno-transportnyh proisshestviy s uchastiem molodyh voditeley // Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona. 2012.

7. Ros. gaz. 2017. 30 iyunya. URL: https://rg.ru/2017/06/30/statistika-voditeli.html (data obrascheniya: 17.10.2017).

8. Iz-za kogo proishodyat avarii … URL: https://www.drive2.ru/b/1683751/ (data obrascheniya: 17.10.2017).

9. Agaev G.A., Nemchenko S.B., Zorina E.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika Rossii v sfere protivodeystviya prestupleniyam, posyagayuschim na pozharnuyu bezopasnost', podsledstvennym GPN FPS MChS Rossii // Problemy upravleniya riskami v tehnosfere. 2014. № 1 (29). S. 150-157.

10. Ugolovnyy kodeks Ros. Federacii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1996. № 25. St. 2 954.

11. Zhulev V.I. Preduprezhdenie dorozhno-transportnyh proisshestviy. M., 1997. S. 118.

12. Dagel' P.S. Puti sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-pravovyh mer bor'by s prestupnoy neostorozhnost'yu // Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya voprosov bor'by s prestupnost'yu. 1977. S. 30.

13. Zhulev V.I. Transportnye prestupleniya: kommentariy zakonodatel'stva. M.: Anteya: Profobrazovanie, 2000. S. 98.

© journals.igps.ru
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum, 2025 Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot password?