Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The research is devoted to solving the problem of risk assessment at hydrogen-containing gas production and handling facilities by obtaining calculated data on the frequencies of realisation of accidental events on the basis of statistical data on accidents at the facilities under consideration depending on the type of equipment of the facilities, the industry area and the striking effect. In this work, the collection, processing, verification, analysis of statistical data on the objects of production and circulation of hydrogen-containing gas, obtained from the official Hydrogen incidents and accidents database (HIAD 2.1), created by the European commission for hydrogen safety. On the basis of data analysis the frequencies of accident events realisation were obtained depending on the type of facility equipment, industry area and the impact effect on hydrogen-containing gas production and handling facilities.
statistics, hydrogen gas production and handling facilities, frequencies, accident rate, risk assessment, equipment, industry, knock-on effect
1. Ob utverzhdenii Rukovodstva po bezopasnosti «Metodicheskie osnovy analiza opasnostej i ocenki riska avarij na opasnyh proizvodstvennyh ob"ektah: prikaz Rostekhnadzora ot 3 noyab. 2022 g. № 387 // Elektronnyj fond pravovoj i normativno-tekhnicheskoj dokumentacii. URL: https://docs.cntd.ru›document/1300154647 (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2024).
2. Ob utverzhdenii metodiki opredeleniya raschetnyh velichin pozharnogo riska na proizvodstvennyh ob"ektah: prikaz MCHS Rossii ot 10 iyulya 2009 g. № 404. Dostup iz inf.-pravovogo portala «Garant».
3. Ezhegodnye otchety o deyatel'nosti Federal'noj sluzhby po ekologicheskomu, tekhnologicheskomu i atomnomu nadzoru // Oficial'nyj sajt federal'noj sluzhby po ekologicheskomu, tekhnologicheskomu i atomnomu nadzoru. URL: https://www.gosnadzor.ru/public/annual_reports/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2024).
4. Itogi deyatel'nosti MCHS Rossii // MCHS Rossii. URL: https://mchs.gov.ru/deyatelnost/itogi-deyatelnosti-mchs-rossii (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2024).
5. Informacionnye sistemy, reestry, bazy i banki dannyh, sborniki // Oficial'nyj sajt FGBU VNIIPO MCHS Rossii. URL: https://vniipo.ru/institut/informatsionnye-sistemy-reestry-bazy-i-banki-danny/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2024).
6. Posobie po opredeleniyu raschetnyh velichin pozharnogo riska dlya proizvodstvennyh ob"ektov. M.: VNIIPO MCHS Rossii, 2012. 242 s.
7. Obespechenie vodorodnoj bezopasnosti na atomnyh elektrostanciyah s vodoohlazhdaemymi reaktornymi ustanovkami. Sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy / I.A. Kirillov [i dr.] // Yadernaya i radiacionnaya bezopasnost'. 2017. № 2 (84). S. 26–37.
8. Grigor'ev S.Yu. Modelirovanie processov konvektivnogo peremeshivaniya i pristenochnogo massoobmena v zadachah analiza vodorodnoj bezopasnosti AES pri tyazheloj avarii: avtoref. dis. … kand. fiz.-mat. nauk. M., 2017. 22 s.
9. Modelirovanie voln davleniya pri deflagracionnom gorenii oblakov toplivno-vozdushnyh smesej / S.I. Sumskoj [i dr.] // Bezopasnost' truda v promyshlennosti. 2023. № 1. S. 15–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2023-1-15-22.
10. Egorov A.A., Timoshenko A.L., Fomin A.V. Ocenka pozharnogo riska na vodorodnyh zapravochnyh stanciyah // Servis bezopasnosti v Rossii: opyt, problemy, perspektivy. Arktika – region strategicheskih interesov: pravovaya politika i sovremennye tekhnologii obespecheniya bezopasnosti v Arkticheskom regione: materialy Mezhdunar. konf. 2022. S. 213.
11. Aminov R.Z., Burdenkova E.Yu., Portyankin A.V. Metodika ocenki godovogo riska ot polomok, pozharov i vzryvov na osnove grafov sostoyanij v elektroliznyh cekhah // Nadezhnost' i bezopasnost' energetiki. 2018. T. 11. № 4. S. 305–310. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24223/1999-5555-2018-11-4-305-310.
12. Aminov R.Z., Portyankin A.V. Analiz komponovochnyh reshenij elektroliznogo cekha vodorodnoj nadstrojki s uchetom nadezhnosti i vzryvopozharoopasnosti // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Problemy energetiki. 2018. T. 20. № 5-6. S. 29–36.
13. Quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen gas explosion accidents at complex hydrogen refueling station / Park Byoungjik [et al.] // Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation. 2023. № 23. P. 71–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.5.71.
14. Safety investigation of hydrogen energy storage systems using quantitative risk assessment / Le Son [et al.] // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022. № 48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.082.
15. Jafari Mohammad Javad, Zarei Esmaeil, Badri Naser. The quantitative risk assessment of a hydrogen generation unit // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012. № 37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.082.
16. Risk assessment of fire and explosion accidents in oil-hydrogen fueling station based on fault tree analysis / Du Lianming [et al.] // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2024. № 2723. P. 012005. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2723/1/012005.
17. Jang Dae-Jin, Kim Seo-Yeon, Lee Min. Property based Quantitative Risk Assessment of Hydrogen Compared with Methane, Ethane, Propane and Butane // Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, B. 2022. № 46 (2). P. 103–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2022.46.2.103.
18. Alfasfos Rami, Sillman Jani, Soukka Risto. Lessons learned and recommendations from analysis of hydrogen incidents and accidents to support risk assessment for the hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024. № 60. P. 1203–1214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.226.
19. Joint Research Centre Data Catalogue // European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) (2023): HIAD 2.1. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). URL: https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset/1d6b06e9-3a89-4ec2-b051-3fb8a28eab9f (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2024).
20. Statistics, lessons learned and recommendations from analysis of HIAD 2.0 database / Wen Jennifer [et al.] // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022. № 47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.170.
