Russian Federation
Russian Federation
In civil proceedings, it is possible to differentiate evidence into those existing before the start of judicial proceedings and those created after the initiation of a civil case in court. The latter, for example, include the conclusions of a forensic expert. The evidence created has certain specifics: it is certainly relevant, and its admissibility and reliability, among other factors, depends on compliance with the procedure for their creation. Applicable to the expert's conclusions, it can be argued that they will be acceptable and reliable, including if the study is conducted by a competent and legitimate expert who strictly adheres to the methodology of forensic examination.
civil proceedings, types of evidence, evidence being created, expert conclusions, methodology of forensic examination
1. Grazhdanskij processual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 14 noyab. 2002 g. № 138-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2002. № 46. St. 4532.
2. Sahnova T.V. O kriteriyah i predposylkah sudebnoj ekspertizy v civilisticheskom processe (na primere psihologicheskoj ekspertizy) // Teoriya i praktika sudebnoj ekspertizy v sovremennyh usloviyah: materialy VII Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. M.: RG-Press. 2019. S. 453–455.
3. Yudin I.V. Zaklyuchenie o rezul'tatah ekspertizy kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2023. 238 s.
4. Yudin I.V. Dopustimost' zaklyucheniya o rezul'tatah ekspertizy i status chastnogo eksperta // Pravo. Bezopasnost'. Chrezvychajnye situacii. 2023. № 2 (59). S. 85–90.
5. Aver'yanova T.V. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. Kurs obshchej teorii. M.: Norma, 2008. S. 462.
